A while ago I noted that the concept of "Best of Breed" was perhaps a dying breed. Nevertheless, prospective clients often ask me "if I were starting from scratch, what would you recommend?" In order to answer this, you first have to ask two questions:
1. In terms of spending money, on a scale that ranges from "I know I have to do it, but I don't want to spend a penny more than absolutely necessary" to "I'm willing to spend a little more if it will increase productivity and any competitive advantage vis a vis other firms" – where does your firm stand? Interestingly, virtually all firms immediately know their answer – nobody has to think about it for very long.
2. How much customization do you want to do? - a lot to match your practice needs in great detail, or minimal, just to get up and running and make it easy for technophobic attorneys? Again, most firms are quite clear on this issue.
There are three types of functionality a firm must provide for:
Practice Management
Time/Billing/Accounting
Document Management
For practice management, for firms that don't want to spend money and don't care about customization, I recommend Amicus Attorney. For firms on the higher end of both scales, I recommend TimeMatters.
For Time/Billing/Accounting, the choice is simple: PCLaw best fits the needs of almost all firms up to at least 25-30 users.
For Document Management, the choice is equally simple: Worldox.
Some people argue that TimeMatters has an adequate or "good enough" document management system and why go to the extra expense of Worldox? There are many reasons to do this, but the main ones include:
Worldox is an industrial strength solution that forces end users to use it. TM depends on the good will and training of end users. Do you want to depend on the good will and discipline of end users when they are trying to cut corners to meet a deadline?
Worldox search capacities are significantly superior to those in TM. For example, Worldox will let you do a search for specific words in a particular type of document (contract, say). TM will not.
Worldox does an excellent job of mail management, including attachments. This is one of the main weaknesses of TM and frequently requires the purchase of a relatively expensive add-in to remedy.
The additional expense of Worldox will more than pay for itself in very short order.